Tough Choices for Farmers
Weather in the Strawberry Fields
Stacy Tyo
Granite State ECO 512
September 2013
Perfect
weather conditions forced strawberry growers in Queensland Australia to destroy
more crops than they harvested. Instead
of a steady growth of strawberries all season long the farmers received their
entire crop at one time. This unwanted
occurrence placed the farmers in a difficult position. Over 200 strawberry farmers with literally
millions of strawberry plants producing all at once meant a flood of the
market. Farmers struggled with the
decision to plow under a majority of their crop in order to get what was fresh
to the market on time. In addition
farmers attempted to plant new strawberries to balance out the rest of the
season. This risky move requires a lot
from Mother Nature as far as the remainder of the strawberry season is
concerned. Combine this with other variables such as new competition in the
market and the fact that farmers could only stand by and watch the prices drop
drastically. Not only can the weather conspire to control
the “end price” for the grower but supermarket chains decide the growers’
profits by the price they pay. This
occurrence resulted in the 2013 strawberry season recording a 30 year low for berry
prices.
The farmers are producing strawberries which are a product. The farmers are selling their strawberries to
supermarkets for money. The supply or
quantity producers sell in 2013 varied greatly from last year due a supply shifter in this case: the all at once arrival of the crop. The supply
curve can be seen when comparing each year quantities and timing of the
strawberry harvest. In 2013 the supply
schedule was not spread out as evenly as it had been in previous years. In the past consumers were able to purchase
limited fresh berries each week at relatively the same- ( higher than 2013) but
steady prices. Supermarkets
accommodated the flood of strawberries.
However with the abundance of potentially rotting fruit the prices went
down. PED was apparent by the
consumer’s response to the lower prices, again the delicacy of the product made
any chance of profit to the farmers small.
The farmers did what they could to supply consumers with a product. The farmers knew that they could not pay the
labor with the money that they would make by selling an over abundance of their
product at one time. Essentially the
farmers would pay labor for 5 times as
long to harvest 5 times as much
fruit and sell the fruit for 5 times less
money. The example of PES did not favor the producers. The farmer’s response to the price
change was disappointing to the farmers who supply the produce and a benefit to
the consumers who purchased the fruit at a 30 year low. Here is also an example
of how the delicacy of a product affects the law of supply. When the fruit was priced higher in previous years the
quantity was steady. Again when the
fruit prices were lower the supply was higher, which breaks the law of supply. Perishables must fall into
an exception category and possibly have a different set of laws of economics? In the case of the strawberry farmer
producing more at one time means less profit.
Elizabeth Marx, September 16, 2013 Bumper Crop not
so Sweet as Growers Destroy Berries
Sandra Godwin, September 11, 2013
Strawberry Glut Hits Prices
No comments:
Post a Comment